To fix the issue True Gapless technology is used. It can cause artifacts at borders after resampling and other processing. They have non-zero levels at track borders. Some albums are uninterrupted (operas, live concerts). Optionally, for 24-bit and more output, a converter can allow applying of differing to 16-bit input. And, lesser speed is higher sound quality. Processing distortions may be audible or visible after analysis.Īs rule, speed of conversion defines sound quality. In case #2 (resampling, lossy compressing, bit depth altering, etc.) a converter defines sound quality. But re-encoding of lossy files adds losses in the splitting. When lossless files (FLAC, WAV, etc.) are splitted, re-encoding doesn't cause quality losses. CUE-splitting with re-encoding can solve this issue. It causes re-placement of part of one track's content to neighbor song. And track border may be moved into a frame. As rule, the compressed files are divided by frames. When CUE with compressed file is splitted, the splitting may be provided without re-encoding. If we get real sound difference, another reason is there, probably. There is functionality difference is possible. In case #1, it does not matter that converter is used. It is a lossless format repacking without audio processing (altering resolution audio, in instance).
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |